<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>coljac &#187; crikey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coljac.net/tag/crikey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coljac.net</link>
	<description>Colin Jacobs in, on and about the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:16:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Men at Work vs. Kookaburra</title>
		<link>http://coljac.net/2010/opinion/men-at-work-vs-kookaburra/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=men-at-work-vs-kookaburra</link>
		<comments>http://coljac.net/2010/opinion/men-at-work-vs-kookaburra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coljac.net/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Tim Dunlop missed the point yesterday in his Crikey piece about the Men at Work/Kookaburra case. Trying to decide whether they did or did nor borrow the melody from the folk song seems, to me, insignificant compared to the question of &#8220;should it matter if they did?&#8221;. Here&#8217;s my response (as a letter) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coljac.net/2010/opinion/men-at-work-vs-kookaburra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

