<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>coljac &#187; efa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coljac.net/tag/efa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coljac.net</link>
	<description>Colin Jacobs in, on and about the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:16:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The narrow view of the federal police</title>
		<link>http://coljac.net/2010/writing/the-narrow-view-of-the-federal-police/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-narrow-view-of-the-federal-police</link>
		<comments>http://coljac.net/2010/writing/the-narrow-view-of-the-federal-police/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coljac.net/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a piece today in Crikey about a submission by the Australian Federal Police, worrying that the NBN would be a haven for criminals. Today I wrote over at EFA how the AFP are pushing for tough data retention laws. Given how powerful the police are as a lobby group &#8211; since no politician [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coljac.net/2010/writing/the-narrow-view-of-the-federal-police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EFA Chair</title>
		<link>http://coljac.net/2010/stuff/efa-chair/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=efa-chair</link>
		<comments>http://coljac.net/2010/stuff/efa-chair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suzor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coljac.net/?p=338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of this week I have assumed the role of Chair of the EFA board of management. Over the last few years EFA has increased its public profile markedly, and has played a leading role in debates around the internet filter, R-18+ games, privacy, and other issues. This has been in no small part to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coljac.net/2010/stuff/efa-chair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Filtering on the 7pm Project</title>
		<link>http://coljac.net/2010/internet/filtering-on-the-7pm-project/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=filtering-on-the-7pm-project</link>
		<comments>http://coljac.net/2010/internet/filtering-on-the-7pm-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7pm project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coljac.net/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conroy faced the public tonight on Channel 10&#8242;s The 7PM Project. I gave my input and let fly a few sound bites for the lead-in piece, but the interesting bit is the discussion that follows. The producers and hosts of the show were well-informed, and asked the tough questions. They demonstrated that filtering won&#8217;t help [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coljac.net/2010/internet/filtering-on-the-7pm-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question Time Cameo</title>
		<link>http://coljac.net/2010/politics/question-time-cameo/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=question-time-cameo</link>
		<comments>http://coljac.net/2010/politics/question-time-cameo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[question time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coljac.net/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The campaign against mandatory internet filtering, which any loyal reader will know has consumed a good portion of my life these last few years, has heated up in recent days in exciting ways. Reporters Without Borders (Reporters Sans Frontieres, RSF), after writing an open letter to Kevin Rudd late last year, last week added Australia [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coljac.net/2010/politics/question-time-cameo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://coljac.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/conroy_has_a_go.mp3" length="1081736" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The battle for an open Internet</title>
		<link>http://coljac.net/2010/politics/the-battle-for-an-open-internet/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-battle-for-an-open-internet</link>
		<comments>http://coljac.net/2010/politics/the-battle-for-an-open-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coljac.net/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently the trends in Internet freedom have been all bad. China&#8217;s censorship regime escalated dramatically over the last 12 months, with a more aggressive Golden Shield, tumultuous events in Iran and of course Australia&#8217;s own filtering plan. It is therefore extremely heartening to see the tough new stand on Internet freedom taken by the USA. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coljac.net/2010/politics/the-battle-for-an-open-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Filtering questions left unanswered</title>
		<link>http://coljac.net/2010/internet/filtering-questions-left-unanswered/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=filtering-questions-left-unanswered</link>
		<comments>http://coljac.net/2010/internet/filtering-questions-left-unanswered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coljac.net/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a debate as nuanced as the one against filtering, it can be hard to penetrate the sound bites about kids and get some focus on the real policy underneath. With the filtering moving from policy to law, though, we can hope that scrutiny will increase. Here are my suggestions (over at EFA) for some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coljac.net/2010/internet/filtering-questions-left-unanswered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7PM appearance and filtering roundup</title>
		<link>http://coljac.net/2009/media/7pm-appearance-and-filtering-roundup/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=7pm-appearance-and-filtering-roundup</link>
		<comments>http://coljac.net/2009/media/7pm-appearance-and-filtering-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coljac.net/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last couple of weeks have been pretty hectic thanks largely to Senator Conroy&#8217;s announcement that it&#8217;s full steam ahead with Internet censorship. At EFA we&#8217;ve been flat out keeping up with media requests and corralling the outflow of support into a coherent campaign. We&#8217;re working with volunteers, other organisations, and internally to make sure January will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coljac.net/2009/media/7pm-appearance-and-filtering-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cleanfeed op-ed in the The Oz</title>
		<link>http://coljac.net/2009/writing/cleanfeed-op-ed-in-the-the-oz/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cleanfeed-op-ed-in-the-the-oz</link>
		<comments>http://coljac.net/2009/writing/cleanfeed-op-ed-in-the-the-oz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 01:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coljac.net/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pressure is still on Conroy over his plan to censor Australia&#8217;s Internet. The public and the opposition are still calling for the plan to be abandoned and the Government to come clean. My own contribution, which takes a Western theme today, is an op-ed in the Australian. Despite all the noise, though, I think [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coljac.net/2009/writing/cleanfeed-op-ed-in-the-the-oz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Matilda post: Conroy Comes Out Swinging</title>
		<link>http://coljac.net/2009/opinion/new-matilda-post-conroy-comes-out-swinging/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-matilda-post-conroy-comes-out-swinging</link>
		<comments>http://coljac.net/2009/opinion/new-matilda-post-conroy-comes-out-swinging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 04:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coljac.net:8008/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was a guest blogger on New Matilda&#8217;sPollieGraph blog, discussing the revelations by the Minister on SBS&#8217;s Insight show. Read and comment on the post here.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coljac.net/2009/opinion/new-matilda-post-conroy-comes-out-swinging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Piece in New Matilda</title>
		<link>http://coljac.net/2009/opinion/piece-in-new-matilda/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=piece-in-new-matilda</link>
		<comments>http://coljac.net/2009/opinion/piece-in-new-matilda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nocleanfeed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coljac.net:8008/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a piece in New Matilda having another go at the Conroy Curtain. The awesome thing about it is the picture. Read it here.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://coljac.net/2009/opinion/piece-in-new-matilda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

